Landscapes that could only exist in art spread into the twilight under blue and white skies. Picturesque ruins stand washed by the sea, or sit amid verdant, fairytale scenes ashimmer with turquoise lakes. There are rocket silos, battleships and submarines but, interestingly, their bellicose significance never punctures these magic, nocturnal idylls. Beached like a great whale, the mottled submarine rests in the shallows of a sparkling expanse of water, blending rather than contrasting with the landscape. The rockets on their launch ramp also look fossilized, a sculptural symbol of a shot never to be fired. Peter Duka’s landscapes nearly always pan an extremely broad, horizontal sweep, toying with paradoxes, puzzles and unfathomable secrets. They sustain the notion of the picture as the locus of a serious aesthetic experience. Such experience cannot be grasped in the pragmatic, plus-or-minus terms of actual calculation. It is incalculable and must, by nature, remain utopian.
|
|
In essence, of course, this is a romantic project: one that speaks of visual and other yearnings, of desire perennially unfulfilled. Thus the landscaped gardens of the 18th and 19th centuries serve as foundations for Duka’s work, as they represent a demonstrable “hot seam” between image and reality. Paintings influenced the landscape and garden designs of the period; subsequently, the landscapes and gardens created according to these designs became the subjects of other paintings. In other words, it is here, as nowhere else, that the picture realizes its primordial longing for a world shaped in its own image. Peter Duka and his long-standing artistic partner Caroline Bittermann deal with this theme in their project, “Die Dritte Kammer” (The Third Chamber), which they started in 1995. Their idea becomes reality in the spacious “Secret Gardens of Rolandswerth” at the ARP MUSEUM, Rolandseck Station. As a “walk-in picture,” this garden has become an ideal place for reviewing the reality of pictures and the pictorial nature of reality.
|
|
However, a complex set of metaphors is always at work in these paintings. Its purpose is to devise ideas and concepts as plastic constructs which, despite their purported tangibility, remain opaque and impenetrable. The ruins are always fragmentary and fragile, underlining more than the contrived, constructed, artificial aspects of these scenarios. The constant recomposition of identical or similar architectural features into surreal, hybrid architecture also makes it clear how far Duka’s buildings are actually constructs of ideas. They are textures, whose horizon ranges from the crumbling remains of a failed modernism to Novalis, and finds its fulfilment in the claim, made in his 1789 “Notes for a Romantic Encyclopaedia,” that “the accomplished speculation leads back to nature.” Suspended overhead are luminous, orange-red baroque scrolls, frozen in form and completely without text. This makes sense, because the pictures themselves are the text. And they can only unfold their imaginative power by remaining illegible. |